PLANNING PERMISSION for buildings and garages here, can and MUST BE STOPPED before Monday 16th July 2007ACT NOW
This is Cross Street where it joins the Coast Road c.1912
Little has changed since Sam and Ann Talbot had their shop here and white ducks spread themselves on that bit of grass. The railings have gone now but otherwise the tranquility is the same.
If as many people as possible write in to the council expressing their concerns about the proposed planning application to build two semi-detached cottages on the south lawn of Eastgate Cottage, Cross Street, there is a hope that this ugly and unwanted plan will be thwarted - but the time is short
It seems that a new planning notice has been erected and people haven't realised. On Monday next it will be too late to complain.
If you love Salthouse
if you were born here
and love to visit as
so many do, then take a few minutes
to read this and
help by adding
your opinion and
letting the Council know.
see some photos taken today
(Wednesday 11th July '07)
Messages and letters must flood the Council offices
before Monday next:16th July 2007
However you make the comment you must include the reference number PLA/20070961
North Norfolk District Council,
Holt Road, CROMER NR27 9EN
or the title: "ERECTION OF TWO ONE AND A HALF STOREY DWELLINGS - EASTGATE
COTTAGE CROSS STREET SALTHOUSE"
Voice your concern or express your disagreement, and give your name, address and contact details -
Anonymous letters have no effect
Here are some of the objections which may have an effect on the outcome:
BLOCKING the VIEW of an ancient Cottage (Eastgate Cottage)
THE STYLE IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH THE SURROUNDINGS
FLOOD: Even if the buildings are a few inches above the average flood height, wave action could cause damage
NUISANCE TO NEIGHBOURS being over-looked
OVER-DEVELOPMENT and crowding of two cottages in a small garden
DRASTIC CHANGES in the entrance and rebuilding of ancient flint wall
ABUSE OF AN AREA OF OUTSTANDING NATURAL BEAUTY - The developers who own this property have been trying for over two years to develop this site, which many feel would be detrimental to the character of this area of outstanding natural beauty and the Conservation Area.
[click here to see all the information concerning the Eastgate Cottage site]
click the image to see large
enough to read!
The first application in November 2005 was withdrawn as they had put in plans
to build a house on the land at the entrance to Cross Street.
The second application was refused by the Planning Committee. It was taken to appeal
by the applicant and was refused in Jan 2007
We are now on the third application!
Mrs. Gilly Case (01328-805001), a very concerned Salthouse lover, says:
"One thing I am horrified about, is that the Developer proposes knocking down part of the old flint wall and rebuilding it along the line of a vision splay.
Firstly this will be out of keeping with the design of an old flint wall and I have been told that it will NEVER look the same."
Peter J Golder, the Inspector appointed for the first examination, said: "A particular feature of existing development along the Coast Road, is the random, open and looseknit pattern of development which in large measure derives from numerous areas of undeveloped land, both sizeable and small, and public and private. These range from large public areas such as the Green to smaller pieces of garden land such as that belonging to Eastgate Cottage. This parcel of land combines with open land on the opposite side of Cross Street and the wider areas of "verge" along the Coast Road to give a particularly open appearance which is evident for some distance in either direction
"The erection of a block of three garages here with steeply pitched gables and screen walling would be prominent and intrusive and significantly erode the open and undeveloped appearance of this piece of land. It would be particularly harmful to the very special environmental qualities of this area of Salthouse."
Val fiddian says: " The frontage along the coast road and the buildings at the bottom of Cross Street is the part of the village where the indigenous Salthouse wild fowlers and farming folk lived. So far their houses have been carefully maintained, though of course newcomers have moved in.
Ugly crowded new buildings and garages in this area would be a crying shame."
David Lincoln of Cross Street, Salthouse, says:
"I will be writing a letter objecting to the building in the garden of
Eastgate Cottage, Salthouse; below are the personal views I will be
1) The plot is not large enough for the cottages and will look out of
keeping with the immediate area.
2) There are no matching semi-detached cottages in Salthouse of the era of
3) The demolition of the old roadside wall is unacceptable.
4) The design is NOT 'in the style of Salthouse Cottages
5) The terraces to the rear of the new buildings will not function as a
rescue platform as they are inaccessible to a boat.
6) Materials should be strictly specified.
1) The over crowding is particularly relevant to the obstruction of the
view of the southern gable end of Eastgate Cottage. Eastgate Cottage as
many historic features including this gable end which should be seen as
important as a historical feature able to be viewed by the public.
2) What we think of as the 'Salthouse cottage' are buildings which have been
built in a haphazard way over the centuries. None of them were built as
matching semi - detached.
3) The demolition of the old roadside wall is unacceptable because it is
such a prominent feature of this ancient part of Cross Street. Rebuilding would have two problems -
a) where walls have had to be rebuilt because of
accident in Cross and Purdy Street they do not look 'old', they are
b) realigning it to the view line of the vehicular exit
would be an 'urban' feature.
4) The design is NOT in the style of Salthouse cottages as there are no
mirror image semi detached cottages in this ancient area. All nearby
cottages have at least a 45 degree pitch to the roofs, this design has less
than 45 degrees. They were not built with garages, or steps to the door, or
over hanging roofs over the door.
5) To the best of my understanding, the raised terraces/platforms on
properties below the flood-line are to facilitate rescuer by boat in event
of flood. The over-crowding of this site would prevent even the smallest
craft from reaching the terrace at the rear.
6) If this application is passed it will be a sad day for this historic part
of Salthouse, and consequently this conservation area and Area of
Outstanding Natural Beauty. But if it is passed strict detailing of
materials will be essential -
* the flints should be grey/blue 'sea flints' and not field or quarried
* the mortar should be 100% lime mortar and not a cement lime mix.
* the bricks and tiles should be recycled from North Norfolk properties of
similar age to Eastgate Cottage. (At that time the bricks were made quite
locally using the nearest clay)"
The following is
taken from the North Norfolk District Council website: What are the additional controls within Conservation Areas?
As every development must either preserve or enhance
and character of a conservation area,
the Local Planning Authority will only permit new development that:-
* achieves a high standard of design sympathetic with the
character of the area,
* is compatible with the scale, mass and form of adjacent
buildings and their settings,
* uses appropriate materials,
* includes appropriate, good quality landscaping that
compliments the area,
* does not result in the loss of important open spaces or
features of interest, and
* does not impinge upon views, into, out of, and within the
|People who have previously written in, and need to write again for this third application, are:
MR and MRS J. FERGUSON, MR. BRYAN RINGROSE, MRS. WENDY ELSDEN, MRS. J. CINNAMON, SHIRLEY DAGGER, MR. OWEN, MRS. JAMES, MR. H. LAWLESS, MOLLY COLEMAN, MR. and MRS. THROWER, CAROLYN AND JOHN FERGUSON, MR. D. LINCOLN, MR. BAGLEY